Weak link versus strong link teams
Updated: May 27, 2021
My first exposure to the concept of weak versus strong-link teams was from Malcolm Gladwell's excellent Revisionist History podcast (series 1, episode 6). It comes from a book by David Sally and Chris Anderson (The Numbers Game). The authors asked what matters more if you want to build an excellent soccer team (that's football to anyone outside the United States)?
How good your best player is, or how good is your worst player?
Based on Sally and Anderson's research - with soccer, it's the worst player that is the most important because "...mistakes turn out to be a very important part of soccer as a team sport." The weakest players on the pitch more often make mistakes. The worst member of the team can altogether cancel out the best, most talented player.
Soccer is a weak-link game
Basketball is the opposite end of the spectrum. Apparently (I am no expert on this sport), with basketball it doesn't matter how good your fifth player is, how good your superstar player is what matters.
Basketball is a strong-link game
Are you operating in a weak-link business where the "malfunctioning part" can cause expensive mistakes to occur? Like football (see I reverted to type, it pains me to call it soccer), a human error or perhaps an inefficient process, or poor communication between teams working out of offices separated by time zones and different languages can offset the wins created by a star salesperson.
Or are you operating in a strong-link environment where the performance of the best, and most talented people have the most substantial impact on the business outcomes and results?
In financial and professional services, I would posit there are a tendency to reward (fastest promotions, the largest bonuses, share of profits) behaviours that are consistent with the strong-link assumption. Further support for the strong-link argument is that more often than not, the investment in people development is highly selective and not broadly applied. The highest potential Associates, the newly promoted Consultants, the Director level professionals most likely to be promoted to Partner or Managing Director, get sent on the training courses or receive mentors or coaching. And hence, in many respects, it becomes a privileged form of personal development.
In a more utopian world where lean employment policies and shrinking training budgets don't exist then obviously investments could be more broadly applied. But the reality is that professionals operate in is a much more challenging environment where tough decisions get made about how to allocate scarce resources.
Should that tough decision be to switch from strong-link to weak link for investments in people development?
What would happen if the mindset changed, and the assumption was these are weak-link businesses? I don't pretend to have the answer but it deserves a conversation or two...
Bruised egos - check
Awkward conversations between those used to receiving the attention - check
Team effectiveness and impact higher or lower - ?
Long-term profits generated by the business higher or lower - ?
Share
If you enjoyed reading this article, then please share it with someone in your network who might appreciate it, like a friend, family member, or coworker.
Subscribe
If you liked this article, then please subscribe below for more insights like it. No spam, ever! Just great, insightful content on a weekly(ish) basis.
The subject of connecting historical names with local education feels more interesting when there is room for a reader to stop and ask their own questions. A school's name can provide a route into discussing a wider historical period. Seen this way, Jagiellonian history education becomes a topic to explore rather than something to sum up too quickly. I am still thinking through the details, and a small example would help me picture how this works in practice. How can students explore a historical figure without reducing the lesson to a list of dates?
The topic of learning from subject specialists gives me a few things to think about, especially when the discussion moves beyond general advice. A specialist's example can show how a broad principle applies to a particular problem. That is the kind of detail I would keep in mind while exploring expert learning guidance. The part I would like to explore further is what happens when the idea meets a real situation with its own limitations. What makes an expert explanation useful to someone with little background knowledge?
What draws my attention to building connections through Grabow community projects is the possibility of making an unfamiliar subject feel closer to everyday life. A shared project can bring together people who know different parts of a town's story. It gives me a more concrete starting point for thinking about Grabow community learning. I do not have a settled view yet, but this seems like a good place to slow down and look more closely. How can students make a community project useful beyond the classroom?
The topic of exploring local history and learning in Bytow gives me a few things to think about, especially when the discussion moves beyond general advice. Local places can give a history lesson a setting that students can picture for themselves. This is why I would approach Bytow local history with a specific question rather than a fixed expectation. I would probably come back to this question after trying to work through one concrete example rather than deciding immediately. Which everyday landmarks would make a good starting point for a local history project?
Dobrze zaprojektowana edukacja zdalna może być równie skuteczna jak tradycyjna nauka, pod warunkiem że materiały są odpowiednio uporządkowane i angażujące. Krótkie lekcje, ćwiczenia, testy oraz materiały dodatkowe pomagają utrzymać regularność nauki. Ważne jest również umożliwienie uczniom samodzielnego kontrolowania postępów. Strona poświęcona metodom nauki online mogłaby być pomocna zarówno dla uczniów, jak i nauczycieli przygotowujących własne kursy.